Hostel: Part II

Starring Lauren German, Bijou Phillips, Heather Matarazzo, Vera Jordanova, and Roger Bart
Written and directed by Eli Roth

There is precious little story to tease in Hostel: Part II: A group of American college girls is lured to a Slovakian village with promises of world-class spas. Once there, they are hacked, mauled, and flayed by well-heeled psychopaths who have paid for the privilege. In the end, one of our girls finds a way to save herself, and the door is left open for a third installment — perhaps something with little people, or an inner city youth baseball team trying to raise money for uniforms that has lost its way. Oh, and the loose end from the first film that was Paxton (Jay Hernandez) is neatly tied up here. Or maybe not so neatly — when your cat is chewing on the neck wound where your head used to be, it can get a wee bit messy.

Early trailers for Hostel: Part II were a small bit of genius—they featured a basso profundo German voice over declaring that Americans have no imagination for killing, followed by a flash of instruments of torture and a cut away shot of a woman bound and screaming. They suggested menace on a very deep level, a rumbling in the bowels to make even the most hardened of us uneasy. In no way does the film live up to this promise. To be sure, it is well made — competent and efficient at 93 minutes, clear in its depiction of the brutality that the overwhelming majority of the audience is coming to witness, and a testimony to the professionalism of a group of young actresses for whom the shoot must have been excruciating (especially poor Heather Matarazzo, who in her “big” scene resembles nothing so much as a horse strung up for processing in the abattoirs on the outskirts of Paris in Georges Franju’s 1949 documentary The Blood Of The Beasts). What is lacking is any hint of narrative or suspense; once Axelle (Jordanova) has convinced Beth, Whitney, and Lorna (German, Phillips, and Matarazzo) to go to the spa rather than to Prague (“Do you want to go to a spa instead of Prague?” “Okay.”), the die is cast, and the film becomes about nothing but the violence. What is left to us is to patiently wait in our seats as each victim is, in turn, treated less kindly than a hand-me-down med school cadaver. And that makes Hostel: Part II an inadvertent issue movie.

The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) Ratings Board is the body that is charged with guiding the film going public in its viewing choices through the application of its evaluative criteria (which are available for viewing at mpaa.org. What is at issue here is what distinguishes an “R” (under 17 requires accompanying adult) and an “NC-17” (no one 17 and under admitted). According to their own language, a film may receive an “R” for “…strong language, violence, nudity, drug abuse, other elements, or a combination of the above.” and an “NC-17” for “excessive violence, sex, aberrational behavior, drug abuse or any other elements which, when present, most parents would consider too strong and therefore off-limits for viewing by their children.” By way of comparison, let us compare Hostel: Part II to another current “R” rated film—the romantic comedy Knocked Up. The latter contains moderate profanity, drug use, and two fairly graphic close ups of child birthing—nothing that would likely be therapy material for later in life, but enough, by rule, to earn its “R”. Hostel depicts, among other things, a naked woman, hung by the heels and begging for her life, being slashed to ribbons with a scythe by another naked woman lying beneath her, who writhes orgasmically as she bathes in the girl’s blood – all while reclining on velvet pillows. The rating? An “R,” just like Knocked Up. If this scene does not meet and exceed your threshold of “excessive violence” and “aberrational behavior,” MPAA, then Game Night at your house is off.

None of this is to say that films like Hostel: Part II should be banned or censored — if this is what puts the olive in your martini, so be it. What it means is that a system that can equate these two films is fundamentally suspect. For a better understanding of the who and the how of the Rating Board, the excellent, funny, and slightly disturbing documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated is highly recommended. But don’t look for a “PG” or an “R” to guide you when you pick that film up — it was pulled from ratings consideration when the MPAA slapped an “NC-17” on it.
– Michael Lee


Ocean’s Thirteen

Starring George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Al Pacino, Matt Damon, Don Cheadle
Directed by Steven Soderbergh

During a summer of substandard sequels, Ocean’s Thirteen has the hook to lure audiences back into the lives of the Ocean gang. Realizing fans likely would not want to see this clan do a heist for the sake of doing another heist, this time it's not about the money; they got the money in Ocean’s Eleven,and kept themselves out of jail in Oceans Twelve. This time it is about revenge and defending one of your own.

Although considered an action movie, this is not a "superhero trying to save the world" flick. It’s actually a buddy movie disguised as an action movie. The film is more about the bond between these characters and the extent they are willing to go for one another than it is about heists. Even thieves and con men have hearts, at least toward each other.

Back for this installment is the entire Oceans gang: George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Don Cheadle, Bernie Mac, Casey Affleck, Scott Caan, Eddie Jemison, Shaobo Qin, Carl Reiner, and Elliott Gould. Andy Garcia also returns to reprise his role as Terry Benedict. Needing to find an adversary capable of sharing the screen with the Oceans team, Al Pacino joins the cast as Willy Bank, with Ellen Barkin starring as his right-hand woman, Abigail Sponder.
The plot is simple: My friend’s enemy is my enemy. When Reuben Tishkoff (Gould) gets double crossed by ruthless casino owner Willy Bank (Pacino) and is left confined to a hospital bed in critical condition, the remainder of the Ocean’s eleven join together with the sole purpose of destroying Bank. The plan is twofold. First, to obliterate him financially by turning the tables on the house of Bank’s new casino appropriately named The Bank so that the patrons would win every time – then, to eradicate his reputation as the only hotelier who has earned “The 5 Diamond Award” on every single one of his hotels.

Clooney and Pitt allow the other characters to develop, and their fellow actors shine in the film. Casey Affleck and Scott Caan, who play brothers Virgil and Turk Malloy, are very active throughout. Acrobat Shaobo Qin, who usually inserts himself into tiny spaces and dangerous situations in his role as Yen, impersonates an enigmatic Chinese real estate magnate as a means of accessing one of The Bank’s exclusive high roller villas. Electronic whiz Livingston Dell (Jemison) is forced to realize he isn’t as good as he thinks he is after he has to seek out help from an old friend (Eddie Izzard) when he cannot rig the automatic card shufflers used in blackjack. Even Cheadle’s character, Basher Tarr, displays his sensitive side when writing Reuben letters of encouragement.
The only character that seems bland and overdone is that of Linus Caldwell, played by Matt Damon. This time around was his chance to be the leader of the group. But the performance seemed more like a whiny child screaming for affection than anything else.
As a whole, the movie is definitely worth seeing. Director Steven Soderbergh keeps the movie fast paced and enticing. The script, written by Brian Koppelman and David Levien (who also wrote the poker movie Rounders) is smart, witty, and warm. Although the climax isn't as outlandish as the first movie, it is highly satisfying.
– Faith Rackoff